Connect with us

Latest News

Crypto losses stemming from hacks, rug pulls up 112% YoY – Immunefi | MATIC News

Avatar

Published

on

The crypto ecosystem experienced significant losses in the second quarter of 2024, with a total of $572.7 million lost due to hacks and frauds — up 112% compared to the same period a year ago, according to Immunefi’s latest quarterly breakdown report.

Meanwhile, year-to-date (YTD) losses due to hacks and frauds have reached $920.9 million, a 24% increase compared to the previous year’s $702.9 million.

May and June saw particularly high losses, with May alone accounting for $358.5 million — the highest monthly total during the second quarter.

The report highlighted the susceptibility of the sector, particularly within centralized finance (CeFi) platforms, which accounted for the 70% of the losses.

Major Incidents

According to the report, the industry suffered 53 hacks and 19 rug pulls during the second quarter. The two most significant incidents contributed to a little over $400 million in losses — equating to 62.8% of the total losses for the quarter.

The largest loss was related to a hack on DMM Bitcoin, a Japanese crypto exchange, which resulted in a $305 million loss. Meanwhile, the second largest incident involved a cyberattack on Turkish crypto exchange BtcTurk that led to an additional $55 million in losses.

Hacks remained the primary cause of losses in the crypto sector, stealing $564.2 million across 53 incidents — a 155% annual increase.

In contrast, frauds, including rug pulls, resulted in $8.5 million in losses across 19 incidents, an 81% decrease from the previous year.

DeFi vs. CeFi

Centralized finance (CeFi) platforms incurred 70% of the total losses, amounting to $401.4 million across five incidents. This represents a 984% increase from the same period last year. Meanwhile, DeFi platforms saw a 25% decrease in losses, totaling $171.3 million across 62 incidents.

Ethereum and BNB Chain were the most targeted blockchain networks in the second quarter. Ethereum experienced 34 incidents, resulting in 46.6% of total losses across targeted chains, while BNB Chain faced 18 incidents, accounting for 24.7% of the losses.

Other chains such as Arbitrum, Blast, and Optimism also reported incidents to a lesser extent.

Recovery efforts resulted in $26.7 million of stolen funds being recovered in four specific instances, making up 5% of the total losses. This is a slight improvement compared to the 3.9% recovery rate in the second quarter of 2023.

The increase in losses due to hacks and frauds highlights ongoing security challenges in the crypto industry. Immunefi’s report highlighted the need for enhanced security measures and vigilance across both DeFi and CeFi platforms to protect user funds and maintain trust in the ecosystem.

Mentioned in this article


Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

VanEck’s Matthew Sigel confirms Solana ETF is a bet on Trump victory | MATIC News

Avatar

Published

on

VanEck Head of Digital Assets Research Matthew Sigel confirmed speculation that the company’s Solana spot ETF proposal bets on Donald Trump winning the US presidency.

The deadline for VanEck’s application is set for March 2025, which would put it well beyond the aftermath of the US Presidential elections in November.

Sigel simply responded with a simple:

“Can confirm.”

The analysts said approval odds for each ETF are “near zero” if a Democrat victory leaves Joe Biden in office and “better … but not guaranteed” if Trump wins the election. Trump would likely appoint a new SEC chair to replace the agency’s current chair, Gary Gensler.

Surveillance sharing

Another issue seen as a hurdle to potential Solana ETF is the lack of a futures market on CME, which experts believe was a key factor in spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs gaining the regulatory green light.

Grayscale notably argued in its case against the SEC that the surveillance sharing agreements in place for the CME Bitcoin futures were replicable for its proposed spot ETF and sufficient to detect and prevent fraudulent activities.

The firm claimed that the SEC failed to provide a reasonable explanation for treating spot Bitcoin ETFs differently from futures ETFs in terms of surveillance-sharing agreements.

The case essentially revolved around whether the SEC’s demand for a surveillance sharing agreement specifically for a spot Bitcoin ETF was justified and whether the SEC applied its standards consistently across different types of Bitcoin-related ETFs.

Since the SEC has now approved spot ETFs for Bitcoin and Ethereum, Sigel believes VanEck will not need to demonstrate a CME futures market around Solana to obtain its ETF. He previously stated:

“Surveillance sharing agreements with spot crypto exchanges can obviate need for CME futures.”

Bloomberg agrees SSA is enough

Bloomberg analysts agreed that an SSA “should be enough” but concluded VanEck’s approach will “only work if there’s new leadership at the SEC and/or a literal act of Congress.”

They noted that past ETF filings, particularly BlackRock’s June 2023 spot Bitcoin ETF application, included surveillance-sharing agreements (SSAs) with Coinbase, leading other firms to introduce similar clauses. However, the analysts added that the agreements ultimately proved unnecessary.

The analysts also said that the SEC’s ongoing securities lawsuits against multiple exchanges, including Coinbase and Kraken, also complicate SSAs between exchanges and ETF issuers.

Mentioned in this article


Continue Reading

Latest News

Bahamas to provide CBDC access via commercial banks | MATIC News

Avatar

Published

on

The Bahamas will provide access to its central bank digital currency (CDBC) the “Sand Dollar” through commercial banks to increase adoption, Reuters reported on July 1, citing the country’s central bank governor.

Governor of the Central Bank of The Bahamas John Rolle said the country intends to establish the regulations within two years and has started signaling its intent to banks.

Rolle said:

“We foresee a process where all of the commercial banks will eventually be in that space and they will be required to provide their clients with access to the [CBDC].”

The Central Bank of the Bahamas reportedly sees the change as critical to raising CBDC and mobile payment adoption rates, even though banks will need to significantly modify their existing IT systems to comply with the upcoming obligations.

Rolle said uptake of the Sand Dollar is still limited years after its launch in 2020, requiring a shift from incentives to enforcement.

Adoption in question

Reuters described low adoption statistics amid the news. It reported that the CBDC accounts for under 1% of the country’s currency in circulation.

Reuters said wallet top-ups fell to $12 million in the eight months before August 2023 from $49.8 million in the same period in 2022, based on central bank data.

Rolle previously described “wide use, but very low average transaction value” in an interview with The New Times on June 19. He said 120,000 mobile wallets exist, equal to 20% of retail bank accounts, but mobile wallets make up less than 1% of retail payments.

Strong short-term data

A central bank press release from February described stronger short-term data. It recognized “modest seasonal growth in digital payments activities,” including the Sand Dollar, even though lower government transfer payments impacted overall year-to-date trends.

The bank said that the person-to-business (P2B) and business-to-business (B2B) transactions reached a combined $4.5 million, mainly involving the Sand Dollars, doubling from November 2022. It said personal wallet counts rose 20% year-to-date in December 2023. Sand Dollars in circulation rose 60.8% to $1.7 million.

Bahamas’ mandatory adoption policies could precede other strategies elsewhere. Reuters noted that the European Central Bank similarly intends to require retail and banks to accept and offer any future digital euro if it proceeds with one.


Continue Reading

Latest News

Polkadot treasury holds $245M but faces revenue decline and two-year runway | MATIC News

Avatar

Published

on

The Polkadot Treasury holds assets equivalent to 38 million DOT, worth approximately $245 million. Head Ambassador Tommi Enenkel, popularly known as Alice and Bob, shared a new report providing the latest update on the network’s treasury.

This balance equates to about two years of the runway at its current spending rate. The report stated:

“At the current rate of spending, the Treasury has about two years of runway left, although the volatile nature of crypto-denominated treasuries makes it hard to predict with confidence.”

Polkadot’s first six months of spending

During the first six months of this year, Polkadot invested heavily in its ecosystem, spending 11 million DOT, valued at around $87 million, across various projects.

According to the report, the network invested about $37 million in Outreach activities such as advertisements, sponsorships, and events. The network signed sponsorship deals with race car driver Conor Daly and also pushed several marketing activities designed to bolster the network’s adoption by the broader global community.

Polkadot also spent $23 million developing its network features and upgrades, including SDK, Data Services and Indexing, Governance, and Subwallets.

Moreover, the network invested $15 million in liquidity incentives and $5.5 million in Talent and Education. Additionally, it spent $3.8 million to maintain the network and core ecosystem components, and another $2.1 million went towards Research.

Revenue decline

The report highlighted a decline in Polkadot’s revenue. During the first six months of the year, the network’s total earnings dropped to 171,696 DOT from 414,291 DOT, recorded in the second half of 2023.

Enenkel attributed this decline to the significant drop in network fees, which fell from 313,443 DOT last year to 39,444 DOT in the 2024 first half:

“We see that direct revenue from fees is still marginal. Polkadot made 300k DOT from fees in 2023-H2 from a short-lived inscriptions campaign. Fees under regular conditions are pretty stable with about 20k DOT per quarter. Other sources of revenue are typically transfers from accounts that return funds that they received and pay them back for various reasons.”

Disclaimer: CryptoSlate has received a grant from the Polkadot Foundation to produce content about the Polkadot ecosystem. While the Foundation supports our coverage, we maintain full editorial independence and control over the content we publish.

Posted In: Polkadot, Tokens


Continue Reading

Trending