Connect with us

Latest News

Exploring the Impact of the Presidential Debate on Crypto | MATIC News

Avatar

Published

on

President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump faced off in their first debate of the 2024 election season on Thursday, June 27, in a high-stakes encounter that highlighted stark contrasts between the two candidates.

The 90-minute discussion, hosted by CNN in Atlanta, covered many critical issues, including the economy, abortion, immigration, foreign policy, and democracy, but failed to include any reference to Bitcoin or crypto.

Neither President Joe Biden nor former President Donald Trump mentioned the industry, despite significant anticipation from the crypto community and substantial financial contributions from crypto-backed super PACs.

Crypto-backed super PACs have raised over $200 million, with Fairshake PAC alone raising over $170 million and spending millions primarily on attack ads for congressional candidates. Further, according to Stand With Crypto, many politicians from both sides are now firmly supportive of crypto, with only 41 strongly against it.

Trump, who has previously positioned himself as pro-crypto, did not bring up the topic during the debate, which offered limited time for extended discourse. Candidates were limited to 2 minutes of talking time, perhaps hindering opportunities to bring up Bitcoin and the scale of crypto’s impact on the economy.

Trump has been vocal about his support for the industry, even hosting a meeting with Bitcoin miners earlier this month and expressing his desire for the crypto to be “made in America.” On the other hand, Biden’s administration has been perceived as more skeptical towards the industry, though some industry leaders suggest that his stance may be softening. However, any substantive positive progress on the matter from the sitting President has yet to materialize.

The debate took contentious turns on several issues, including the economy, abortion, foreign policy, and immigration, but Bitcoin and crypto were never brought up.

Throughout the debate, Biden struggled at times, appearing hesitant and occasionally stumbling over his words. This performance did little to ease concerns about his age and fitness for office, a point of criticism often raised by Republicans. Trump, on the other hand, appeared more assertive and confident, though he interspersed his rhetoric with numerous contentious claims.

Former United States Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill described Biden’s poor performance,

“My job now is to be really honest. Joe Biden had one thing he had to do tonight and he didn’t do it. He had one thing he had to accomplish and that was to reassure America that he was up to the job at his age and he failed at that tonight.”

In the aftermath, Biden attributed his performance issues to a sore throat, while Trump’s campaign and many in the crypto industry viewed the debate as successful. The event has intensified discussions about candidates’ capabilities and their contrasting visions for the nation’s future.

The absence of crypto discussion in this first debate highlights that while the industry has gained significant attention and financial influence, it has not yet become a central issue in mainstream political discourse for the 2024 presidential election.

Mentioned in this article


Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

VanEck’s Matthew Sigel confirms Solana ETF is a bet on Trump victory | MATIC News

Avatar

Published

on

VanEck Head of Digital Assets Research Matthew Sigel confirmed speculation that the company’s Solana spot ETF proposal bets on Donald Trump winning the US presidency.

The deadline for VanEck’s application is set for March 2025, which would put it well beyond the aftermath of the US Presidential elections in November.

Sigel simply responded with a simple:

“Can confirm.”

The analysts said approval odds for each ETF are “near zero” if a Democrat victory leaves Joe Biden in office and “better … but not guaranteed” if Trump wins the election. Trump would likely appoint a new SEC chair to replace the agency’s current chair, Gary Gensler.

Surveillance sharing

Another issue seen as a hurdle to potential Solana ETF is the lack of a futures market on CME, which experts believe was a key factor in spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs gaining the regulatory green light.

Grayscale notably argued in its case against the SEC that the surveillance sharing agreements in place for the CME Bitcoin futures were replicable for its proposed spot ETF and sufficient to detect and prevent fraudulent activities.

The firm claimed that the SEC failed to provide a reasonable explanation for treating spot Bitcoin ETFs differently from futures ETFs in terms of surveillance-sharing agreements.

The case essentially revolved around whether the SEC’s demand for a surveillance sharing agreement specifically for a spot Bitcoin ETF was justified and whether the SEC applied its standards consistently across different types of Bitcoin-related ETFs.

Since the SEC has now approved spot ETFs for Bitcoin and Ethereum, Sigel believes VanEck will not need to demonstrate a CME futures market around Solana to obtain its ETF. He previously stated:

“Surveillance sharing agreements with spot crypto exchanges can obviate need for CME futures.”

Bloomberg agrees SSA is enough

Bloomberg analysts agreed that an SSA “should be enough” but concluded VanEck’s approach will “only work if there’s new leadership at the SEC and/or a literal act of Congress.”

They noted that past ETF filings, particularly BlackRock’s June 2023 spot Bitcoin ETF application, included surveillance-sharing agreements (SSAs) with Coinbase, leading other firms to introduce similar clauses. However, the analysts added that the agreements ultimately proved unnecessary.

The analysts also said that the SEC’s ongoing securities lawsuits against multiple exchanges, including Coinbase and Kraken, also complicate SSAs between exchanges and ETF issuers.

Mentioned in this article


Continue Reading

Latest News

Bahamas to provide CBDC access via commercial banks | MATIC News

Avatar

Published

on

The Bahamas will provide access to its central bank digital currency (CDBC) the “Sand Dollar” through commercial banks to increase adoption, Reuters reported on July 1, citing the country’s central bank governor.

Governor of the Central Bank of The Bahamas John Rolle said the country intends to establish the regulations within two years and has started signaling its intent to banks.

Rolle said:

“We foresee a process where all of the commercial banks will eventually be in that space and they will be required to provide their clients with access to the [CBDC].”

The Central Bank of the Bahamas reportedly sees the change as critical to raising CBDC and mobile payment adoption rates, even though banks will need to significantly modify their existing IT systems to comply with the upcoming obligations.

Rolle said uptake of the Sand Dollar is still limited years after its launch in 2020, requiring a shift from incentives to enforcement.

Adoption in question

Reuters described low adoption statistics amid the news. It reported that the CBDC accounts for under 1% of the country’s currency in circulation.

Reuters said wallet top-ups fell to $12 million in the eight months before August 2023 from $49.8 million in the same period in 2022, based on central bank data.

Rolle previously described “wide use, but very low average transaction value” in an interview with The New Times on June 19. He said 120,000 mobile wallets exist, equal to 20% of retail bank accounts, but mobile wallets make up less than 1% of retail payments.

Strong short-term data

A central bank press release from February described stronger short-term data. It recognized “modest seasonal growth in digital payments activities,” including the Sand Dollar, even though lower government transfer payments impacted overall year-to-date trends.

The bank said that the person-to-business (P2B) and business-to-business (B2B) transactions reached a combined $4.5 million, mainly involving the Sand Dollars, doubling from November 2022. It said personal wallet counts rose 20% year-to-date in December 2023. Sand Dollars in circulation rose 60.8% to $1.7 million.

Bahamas’ mandatory adoption policies could precede other strategies elsewhere. Reuters noted that the European Central Bank similarly intends to require retail and banks to accept and offer any future digital euro if it proceeds with one.


Continue Reading

Latest News

Polkadot treasury holds $245M but faces revenue decline and two-year runway | MATIC News

Avatar

Published

on

The Polkadot Treasury holds assets equivalent to 38 million DOT, worth approximately $245 million. Head Ambassador Tommi Enenkel, popularly known as Alice and Bob, shared a new report providing the latest update on the network’s treasury.

This balance equates to about two years of the runway at its current spending rate. The report stated:

“At the current rate of spending, the Treasury has about two years of runway left, although the volatile nature of crypto-denominated treasuries makes it hard to predict with confidence.”

Polkadot’s first six months of spending

During the first six months of this year, Polkadot invested heavily in its ecosystem, spending 11 million DOT, valued at around $87 million, across various projects.

According to the report, the network invested about $37 million in Outreach activities such as advertisements, sponsorships, and events. The network signed sponsorship deals with race car driver Conor Daly and also pushed several marketing activities designed to bolster the network’s adoption by the broader global community.

Polkadot also spent $23 million developing its network features and upgrades, including SDK, Data Services and Indexing, Governance, and Subwallets.

Moreover, the network invested $15 million in liquidity incentives and $5.5 million in Talent and Education. Additionally, it spent $3.8 million to maintain the network and core ecosystem components, and another $2.1 million went towards Research.

Revenue decline

The report highlighted a decline in Polkadot’s revenue. During the first six months of the year, the network’s total earnings dropped to 171,696 DOT from 414,291 DOT, recorded in the second half of 2023.

Enenkel attributed this decline to the significant drop in network fees, which fell from 313,443 DOT last year to 39,444 DOT in the 2024 first half:

“We see that direct revenue from fees is still marginal. Polkadot made 300k DOT from fees in 2023-H2 from a short-lived inscriptions campaign. Fees under regular conditions are pretty stable with about 20k DOT per quarter. Other sources of revenue are typically transfers from accounts that return funds that they received and pay them back for various reasons.”

Disclaimer: CryptoSlate has received a grant from the Polkadot Foundation to produce content about the Polkadot ecosystem. While the Foundation supports our coverage, we maintain full editorial independence and control over the content we publish.

Posted In: Polkadot, Tokens


Continue Reading

Trending